New Bounds for the Dichromatic Number of a Digraph
Abstract
The chromatic number of a graph G, denoted by (G), is the minimum k such that G admits a k-coloring of its vertex set in such a way that each color class is an independent set (a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices). The dichromatic number of a digraph D, denoted by A(D), is the minimum k such that D admits a k-coloring of its vertex set in such a way that each color class is acyclic. In 1976, Bondy proved that the chromatic number of a digraph D is at most its circumference, the length of a longest cycle. Given a digraph D, we will construct three different graphs whose chromatic numbers bound A(D). Moreover, we prove: i) for integers k≥ 2, s≥ 1 and r1, …, rs with k≥ ri≥ 0 and ri≠ 1 for each i∈[s], that if all cycles in D have length r modulo k for some r∈\r1,…,rs\, then A(D)≤ 2s+1; ii) if D has girth g and there are integers k and p, with k≥ g-1≥ p≥ 1 such that D contains no cycle of length r modulo kp p for each r∈ \-p+2,…,0,…,p\, then A (D)≤ kp ; iii) if D has girth g, the length of a shortest cycle, and circumference c, then A(D)≤ c-1g-1 +1, which improves, substantially, the bound proposed by Bondy. Our results show that if we have more information about the lengths of cycles in a digraph, then we can improve the bounds for the dichromatic number known until now.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.