Observational determination of the galaxy bias from cosmic variance with a random pointing survey: Clustering of z~2 galaxies from Hubble's BoRG survey

Abstract

Gravitational clustering broadens the count-in-cells distribution of galaxies for surveys along uncorrelated (well-separated) lines of sight beyond Poisson noise. A number of methods have proposed to measure this excess "cosmic" variance to constrain the galaxy bias (i.e. the strength of clustering) independently of the two-point correlation function. Here we present an observational application of these methods using data from 141 uncorrelated fields (~700 arcmin2 total) from Hubble's Brightest of Reionizing Galaxies (BoRG) survey. We use BoRG's broad-band imaging in optical and near infrared to identify N~1000 photometric candidates at z~2 through a combination of colour selection and photometric redshift determination, building a magnitude-limited sample with mAB≤24.5 in F160W. We detect a clear excess in the variance of the galaxy number counts distribution compared to Poisson expectations, from which we estimate a galaxy bias b ≈ 3.63 0.57. When divided by SED-fit classification into ~400 early-type and ~600 late-type candidates, we estimate biases of bearly ≈ 4.06 0.67 and blate ≈ 2.98 0.98 respectively. These estimates are consistent with previous measurements of the bias from the two-point correlation function, and demonstrate that with N100 sight-lines, each containing N5 objects, the counts-in-cell analysis provides a robust measurement of the bias. This implies that the method can be applied effectively to determine clustering properties (and characteristic dark-matter halo masses) of z~6-9 galaxies from a pure-parallel James Webb Space Telescope survey similar in design to Hubble's BoRG survey.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…