Forbidden rainbow subgraphs that force large monochromatic or multicolored k-connected subgraphs
Abstract
Let n, k, m be positive integers with n m k, and let A be the set of graphs G of order at least 3 such that there is a k-connected monochromatic subgraph of order at least n-f(G,k,m) in any rainbow G-free coloring of Kn using all the m colors. In this paper, we prove that the set A consists of precisely P6, P3 P4, K2 P5, K2 2P3, 2K2 K3, 2K2 P+4, 3K2 K1,3 and their subgraphs of order at least 3. Moreover, we show that for any graph H∈ A, if n sufficiently larger than m and k, then any rainbow (P3 H)-free coloring of Kn using all the m colors contains a k-connected monochromatic subgraph of order at least cn, where c=c(H) is a constant, not depending on n, m or k. Furthermore, we consider a parallel problem in complete bipartite graphs. Let s, t, k, m be positive integers with min\s, t\ m k and m≥ |E(H)|, and let B be the set of bipartite graphs H of order at least 3 such that there is a k-connected monochromatic subgraph of order at least s+t-f(H,k,m) in any rainbow H-free coloring of Ks,t using all the m colors, where f(H,k,m) is not depending on s or t. We prove that the set B consists of precisely 2P3, 2K2 K1,3 and their subgraphs of order at least 3. Finally, we consider the large k-connected multicolored subgraph instead of monochromatic subgraph. We show that for 1≤ k ≤ 3 and n sufficiently large, every Gallai-3-coloring of Kn contains a k-connected subgraph of order at least n-k-12 using at most two colors. We also show that the above statement is false for k=4t, where t is an positive integer.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.