Colouring of generalized signed planar graphs
Abstract
Assume G is a graph. We view G as a symmetric digraph, in which each edge uv of G is replaced by a pair of opposite arcs e=(u,v) and e-1=(v,u). Assume S is an inverse closed subset of permutations of positive integers. We say G is S-k-colourable if for any mapping σ: E(G) S with σ (x,y) = (σ (y,x))-1, there is a mapping f: V(G) [k]=\1,2, …, k\ such that for each arc e=(x,y), σe(f(x)) f(y). The concept of S-k-colouring is a common generalization of many colouring concepts, including k-colouring, signed k-colouring defined by M\'acajov\'a, Raspaud and Skoviera, signed k-colouring defined by Kang and Steffen, correspondence k-colouring defined by Dvor\'ak and Postle, and group colouring defined by Jaeger, Linial, Payan and Tarsi. We are interested in the problem as for which subset S of S4, every planar graph is S-colourable. Such a subset S is called good. The famous four colour theorem is equivalent to say that S=\id\ is good. There are two conjectures on signed graph colouring, one is equivalent to S=\id, (12)(34)\ be good and the other is equivalent to S=\id, (12)\ be good. We say two subsets S and S' of Sk are conjugate if there is a permutation π ∈ Sk such that S'= \π σπ-1: σ ∈ S\. This paper proves that if S is a good subset of S4 containing id, then S is conjugate to a subset of \id, (12), (34), (12)(34)\. However, it remains an open problem if there is any good subset S which contains id and has cardinality |S| 2. We also prove that S=\(12),(13),(23),(123),(132)\ is not good.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.