Generation of relative commutator subgroups in Chevalley groups. II
Abstract
In the present paper, which is a direct sequel of our paper [12] joint with Roozbeh Hazrat, we prove unrelativised version of the standard commutator formula in the setting of Chevalley groups. Namely, let be a reduced irreducible root system of rank 2, let R be a commutative ring and let I,J be two ideals of R. We consider subgroups of the Chevalley group G(,R) of type over R. The unrelativised elementary subgroup E(,I) of level I is generated (as a group) by the elementary unipotents xα(), α∈, ∈ I, of level I. Obviously, in general E(,I) has no chances to be normal in E(,R), its normal closure in the absolute elementary subgroup E(,R) is denoted by E(,R,I). The main results of [12] implied that the commutator [E(,I),E(,J)] is in fact normal in E(,R). In the present paper we prove an unexpected result that in fact [E(,I),E(,J)]=[E(,R,I),E(,R,J)]. It follows that the standard commutator formula also holds in the unrelativised form, namely [E(,I),C(,R,J)]=[E(,I),E(,J)], where C(,R,I) is the full congruence subgroup of level I. In particular, E(,I) is normal in C(,R,I).
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.