Approximation algorithms for the vertex-weighted grade-of-service Steiner tree problem

Abstract

Given a graph G = (V,E) and a subset T ⊂eq V of terminals, a Steiner tree of G is a tree that spans T. In the vertex-weighted Steiner tree (VST) problem, each vertex is assigned a non-negative weight, and the goal is to compute a minimum weight Steiner tree of G. We study a natural generalization of the VST problem motivated by multi-level graph construction, the vertex-weighted grade-of-service Steiner tree problem (V-GSST), which can be stated as follows: given a graph G and terminals T, where each terminal v ∈ T requires a facility of a minimum grade of service R(v)∈ \1,2,…\, compute a Steiner tree G' by installing facilities on a subset of vertices, such that any two vertices requiring a certain grade of service are connected by a path in G' with the minimum grade of service or better. Facilities of higher grade are more costly than facilities of lower grade. Multi-level variants such as this one can be useful in network design problems where vertices may require facilities of varying priority. While similar problems have been studied in the edge-weighted case, they have not been studied as well in the more general vertex-weighted case. We first describe a simple heuristic for the V-GSST problem whose approximation ratio depends on , the number of grades of service. We then generalize the greedy algorithm of [Klein \& Ravi, 1995] to show that the V-GSST problem admits a (2 |T|)-approximation, where T is the set of terminals requiring some facility. This result is surprising, as it shows that the (seemingly harder) multi-grade problem can be approximated as well as the VST problem, and that the approximation ratio does not depend on the number of grades of service.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…