Constant gap between conventional strategies and those based on C*-dynamics for self-embezzlement
Abstract
We consider a bipartite transformation that we call self-embezzlement and use it to prove a constant gap between the capabilities of two models of quantum information: the conventional model, where bipartite systems are represented by tensor products of Hilbert spaces; and a natural model of quantum information processing for abstract states on C*-algebras, where joint systems are represented by tensor products of C*-algebras. We call this the C*-circuit model and show that it is a special case of the commuting-operator model (in that it can be translated into such a model). For the conventional model, we show that there exists a constant ε0 > 0 such that self-embezzlement cannot be achieved with precision parameter less than ε0 (i.e., the fidelity cannot be greater than 1 - ε0); whereas, in the C*-circuit model -- as well as in a commuting-operator model -- the precision can be 0 (i.e., fidelity~1).
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.