Comment to 'On the reality of the quantum state'

Abstract

In Nature Phys. 8:475-478 (2012), Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph have claimed that -epistemic quantum mechanics (QM) is inconsistent with predictions of standard QM. Here we show that Pusey et al. err in the beginning of their argument by making an assumption that violates the Projection Postulate.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…