Crystallization in Three-Dimensions: Defect-Driven Topological Ordering and the Role of Geometrical Frustration

Abstract

Herein, fundamentals of topology and symmetry breaking are used to understand crystallization and geometrical frustration in topologically close-packed structures. This frames solidification from a new perspective that is unique from thermodynamic discussions. Crystallization is considered as developing from undercooled liquids, in which orientational order is characterized by a surface of a sphere in four-dimensions (quaternion) with the binary polyhedral representation of the preferred orientational order of atomic clustering inscribed on its surface. As a consequence of the dimensionality of the quaternion orientational order parameter, crystallization is seen as occurring in "restricted dimensions." Homotopy theory is used to classify all topologically stable defects, and third homotopy group defect elements are considered to be generalized vortices that are available in superfluid ordered systems. This topological perspective approaches the liquid-to-crystalline solid transition in three-dimensions from fundamental concepts of: Bose-Einstein condensation, the Mermin-Wagner theorem and Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) topological-ordering transitions. In doing so, in this article, concepts that apply to superfluidity in "restricted dimensions" are generalized in order to consider the solidification of crystalline solid states.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…