Interacting helical vortex filaments in the 3-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau equation

Abstract

For each given n≥ 2, we construct a family of entire solutions u (z,t), >0, with helical symmetry to the 3-dimensional complex-valued Ginzburg-Landau equation equation* u+(1-|u|2)u=0, (z,t) ∈ R2× R R3. equation* These solutions are 2π/-periodic in t and have n helix-vortex curves, with asymptotic behavior as 0 u (z,t) ≈ Πj=1n W( z- -1 fj( t) ), where W(z) =w(r) eiθ , z= reiθ, is the standard degree +1 vortex solution of the planar Ginzburg-Landau equation W+(1-|W|2)W=0 in R2 and fj(t) = n-1 eite2 i (j-1)π/ n ||, j=1,…, n. Existence of these solutions was previously conjectured, being f(t) = (f1(t),…, fn(t)) a rotating equilibrium point for the renormalized energy of vortex filaments there derived, W ( f ) :=π ∫02π ( \, | | 2 Σk=1n|f'k(t)|2-Σj≠ k |fj(t)-fk(t)| \, ) d t, corresponding to that of a planar logarithmic n-body problem. These solutions satisfy |z| +∞ |u (z,t)| = 1 uniformly in t and have nontrivial dependence on t, thus negatively answering the Ginzburg-Landau analogue of the Gibbons conjecture for the Allen-Cahn equation, a question originally formulated by H. Brezis.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…