Fractals and the monadic second order theory of one successor
Abstract
We show that if X is virtually any classical fractal subset of Rn, then (R,<,+,X) interprets the monadic second-order theory of (N,+1). This result is sharp in the sense that the standard model of the monadic second-order theory of (N,+1) is known to interpret (R,<,+,X) for various classical fractals X including the middle-thirds Cantor set and the Sierpinski carpet. Let X ⊂eq Rn be closed and nonempty. We show that if the Ck-smooth points of X are not dense in X for some k ≥ 1, then (R,<,+,X) interprets the monadic second-order theory of (N,+1). The same conclusion holds if the packing dimension of X is strictly greater than the topological dimension of X and X has no affine points.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.