Fully strained epitaxial Ti1-xMgxN(001) layers

Abstract

Ti1-xMgxN(001) layers with 0.00 ≤ x ≤ 0.49 are deposited on MgO(001) by reactive magnetron co-sputtering from titanium and magnesium targets in 5 mTorr pure N2 at 600 C. X-ray diffraction ω-2θ scans, ω-rocking curves, φ-scans, and high resolution reciprocal space maps show that the Ti1-xMgxN layers are rock-salt structure single crystals with a cube-on-cube epitaxial relationship with the substrates: (001)TiMgN (001)MgO and [100]TiMgN [100]MgO. Layers with thickness d = 35-58 nm are fully strained, with an in-plane lattice parameter of 4.2120.001 matching that of the MgO substrate, while the out-of-plane lattice parameter increases with x from 4.251 for TiN(001) to 4.289 for Ti0.51Mg0.49N(001). This yields a relaxed lattice parameter for Ti1-xMgxN(001) of ao = (1-x)aTiN + xaMgN - bx(1-x), where aTiN = 4.239 , aMgN = 4.345 , and the bowing parameter b = 0.113 . In contrast, thicker Ti1-xMgxN(001) layers with d = 110-275 nm are partially (pure TiN) or fully (x = 0.37 and 0.39) relaxed, indicating a critical thickness for relaxation of 50-100 nm. The in-plane x-ray coherence length is large (100-400 nm) for fully strained layers with 0.00 ≤ x ≤ 0.45 but drops by an order of magnitude for x = 0.49 as the composition approaches the phase stability limit. It is also an order of magnitude smaller for thicker (d ≤ 110 nm) layers, which is attributed to strain relaxation through the nucleation and growth of misfit dislocations facilitated by glide of threading dislocations.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…