Dense graphs have rigid parts

Abstract

While the problem of determining whether an embedding of a graph G in R2 is infinitesimally rigid is well understood, specifying whether a given embedding of G is rigid or not is still a hard task that usually requires ad hoc arguments. In this paper, we show that every embedding (not necessarily generic) of a dense enough graph (concretely, a graph with at least C0n3/2 n edges, for some absolute constant C0>0), which satisfies some very mild general position requirements (no three vertices of G are embedded to a common line), must have a subframework of size at least three which is rigid. For the proof we use a connection, established in Raz [Ra], between the notion of graph rigidity and configurations of lines in R3. This connection allows us to use properties of line configurations established in Guth and Katz [GK2]. In fact, our proof requires an extended version of Guth and Katz result; the extension we need is proved by J\'anos Koll\'ar in an Appendix to our paper. We do not know whether our assumption on the number of edges being (n3/2 n) is tight, and we provide a construction that shows that requiring (n n) edges is necessary.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…