Coloring the n-smooth numbers with n colors

Abstract

For which values of n can we color the positive integers with precisely n colors in such a way that for any a, the numbers a,2a,…,na all get different colors? Pach posed the question around 2008-9. Particular cases appeared in K\"oMaL in April 2010, and the general version appeared in May 2010 on MathOverflow, posted by P\'alv\"olgyi. The question remains open. We discuss the known partial results and investigate a series of related matters attempting to understand the structure of these n-satisfactory colorings. Specifically, we show that there is an n-satisfactory coloring whenever there is an abelian group operation on the set \1,2,…,n\ compatible with multiplication in the sense that whenever i, j and ij are in \1,…,n\, then ij=i j. This includes in particular the cases where n+1 is prime, or 2n+1 is prime, or n=p2-p for some prime p, or there is a k such that q=nk+1 is prime and 1k,…,nk are all distinct modulo q (in which case we call q a strong representative of order n). The colorings obtained by this process we call multiplicative. We also show that nonmultiplicative colorings exist for some values of n. There is an n-satisfactory coloring of Z+ if and only if there is such a coloring of the set Kn of n-smooth numbers. We identify all n-satisfactory colorings for n 5 and all multiplicative colorings for n 8, and show that there are as many nonmultiplicative colorings of Kn as there are real numbers for n=6 and 8. We show that if n admits a strong representative q then the set of such q has positive natural density in the set of all primes. We show that the question of whether there is an n-satisfactory coloring is equivalent to a problem about tilings, and use this to give a geometric characterization of multiplicative colorings.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…