Forcing a ()-like principle to hold at a weakly compact cardinal

Abstract

Hellsten MR2026390 proved that when is 1n-indescribable, the n-club subsets of provide a filter base for the 1n-indescribability ideal, and hence can also be used to give a characterization of 1n-indescribable sets which resembles the definition of stationarity: a set S⊂eq is 1n-indescribable if and only if S C≠ for every n-club C⊂eq. By replacing clubs with n-clubs in the definition of (), one obtains a ()-like principle n(), a version of which was first considered by Brickhill and Welch BrickhillWelch. The principle n() is consistent with the 1n-indescribability of but inconsistent with the 1n+1-indescribability of . By generalizing the standard forcing to add a ()-sequence, we show that if is +-weakly compact and GCH holds then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which remains +-weakly compact and 1() holds. If is 12-indescribable and GCH holds then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which is +-weakly compact, 1() holds and every weakly compact subset of has a weakly compact proper initial segment. As an application, we prove that, relative to a 12-indescribable cardinal, it is consistent that is +-weakly compact, every weakly compact subset of has a weakly compact proper initial segment, and there exist two weakly compact subsets S0 and S1 of such that there is no β< for which both S0β and S1β are weakly compact.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…