Mice with finitely many Woodin cardinals from optimal determinacy hypotheses

Abstract

We prove the following result which is due to the third author. Let n ≥ 1. If 1n determinacy and 1n+1 determinacy both hold true and there is no 1n+2-definable ω1-sequence of pairwise distinct reals, then Mn\# exists and is ω1-iterable. The proof yields that 1n+1 determinacy implies that Mn\#(x) exists and is ω1-iterable for all reals x. A consequence is the Determinacy Transfer Theorem for arbitrary n ≥ 1, namely the statement that 1n+1 determinacy implies (n)(<ω2 - 11) determinacy.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…