Numerical Simulations of an Initially Top-Hat Jet and the Afterglow of GW170817\,/\,GRB170817A

Abstract

The afterglow of GRB\,170817A/GW\,170817 was very unusual, slowly rising as Ftobs0.8-0.6, peaking at tobs,pk\,150\;days, and sharply decaying as tobs-2.2. VLBI observations revealed an unresolved radio afterglow image whose flux centroid moved superluminally with vapp≈4c, clearly indicating that the afterglow was dominated by a relativistic jet's compact core. Different jet angular structures explained the afterglow lightcurves: Gaussian and steep power-law profiles with narrow core angles θc5 and larger viewing angles θobs/θc3-5. However, a top-hat jet (with sharp edges at θ=θ0) was ruled out since it appeared to produce an early flux rise much steeper than observed. Using 2D relativistic hydrodynamic simulations we show that the initial steep flux rise is an artifact caused by the simulation's finite start time, t0, missing its flux contributions from t<t0 and sometimes "compensated" using an analytic top-hat jet. While an initially top-hat jet is not very physical, such simulations are particularly useful at tobstobs,pk when the afterglow emission is dominated by the jet's core and becomes insensitive to its exact initial angular profile if it drops off sharply outside of the core. We demonstrate that an initially top-hat jet fits GW\,170817/GRB\,170817A's afterglow lightcurves and flux centroid motion at tobstobs,pk, for θobs/θ0≈3 and may also fit the earlier lightcurves for 0=(t0)102.5. We analytically express the degeneracies between the model parameters, and find a minimal jet energy of Emin≈5.3×1048\;erg and circum-burst medium density of n≈5.3×10-6~ cm-3.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…