Fault Tolerant Network Constructors

Abstract

In this work, we consider adversarial crash faults of nodes in the network constructors model [Michail and Spirakis, 2016]. We first show that, without further assumptions, the class of graph languages that can be (stably) constructed under crash faults is non-empty but small. In particular, if an unbounded number of crash faults may occur, we prove that (i) the only constructible graph language is that of spanning cliques and (ii) a strong impossibility result holds even if the size of the graphs that the protocol outputs in populations of size n need only grow with n (the remaining nodes being waste). When there is a finite upper bound f on the number of faults, we show that it is impossible to construct any non-hereditary graph language. On the positive side, by relaxing our requirements we prove that: (i) permitting linear waste enables to construct on n/(2f)-f nodes, any graph language that is constructible in the fault-free case, (ii) partial constructibility (i.e. not having to generate all graphs in the language) allows the construction of a large class of graph languages. We then extend the original model with a minimal form of fault notifications. Our main result here is a fault-tolerant universal constructor: We develop a fault-tolerant protocol for spanning line and use it to simulate a linear-space Turing Machine M. This allows a fault-tolerant construction of any graph accepted by M in linear space, with waste min\n/2+f(n),\; n\, where f(n) is the number of faults in the execution. We then prove that increasing the permissible waste to min\2n/3+f(n),\; n\ allows the construction of graphs accepted by an O(n2)-space Turing Machine, which is asymptotically the maximum simulation space that we can hope for in this model. Finally, we show that logarithmic local memories can be exploited for a no-waste fault-tolerant simulation of any such protocol.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…