Upper tail bounds for cycles

Abstract

This paper examines bounds on upper tails for cycle counts in Gn,p. For a fixed graph H define H= Hn,p to be the number of copies of H in Gn,p. It is a much studied and surprisingly difficult problem to understand the upper tail of the distribution of H, for example, to estimate equation* P(H > 2 EH). equation* The best known result for general H and p is due to Janson, Oleszkiewicz, and Ruci\'nski, who, in 2004, proved aligna:JOR [-OH, η(MH(n,p) (1/p))]&<P(H > (1+η)E H)\\&<[-H, η(MH(n,p))]. align Thus they determined the upper tail up to a factor of (1/p) in the exponent. There has since been substantial work to improve these bounds for particular H and p. We close the (1/p) gap for cycles, up to a constant in the exponent. Here the lower bound given by JOR is the truth for l-cycles when p> 1/(l-2)nn.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…