Microscopic anisotropy misestimation in spherical-mean single diffusion encoding MRI

Abstract

Purpose: Microscopic fractional anisotropy (μFA) can disentangle microstructural information from orientation dispersion. While double diffusion encoding (DDE) MRI methods are widely used to extract accurate μFA, it has only recently been proposed that powder-averaged single diffusion encoding (SDE) signals, when coupled with the diffusion standard model (SM) and a set of constraints, could be used for μFA estimation. This study aims to evaluate μFA as derived from the spherical mean technique (SMT) set of constraints, as well as more generally for powder-averaged SM signals. Methods: SDE experiments were performed at 16.4 T on an ex vivo mouse brain (/δ = 12/1.5 ms). The μFA maps obtained from powder-averaged SDE signals were then compared to maps obtained from DDE-MRI experiments (/τ/δ = 12/12/1.5 ms), which allow a model-free estimation of μFA. Theory and simulations that consider different types of heterogeneity are presented for corroborating the experimental findings. Results: μFA, as well as other estimates derived from powder-averaged SDE signals produced large deviations from the ground truth in both gray and white matter. Simulations revealed that these misestimations are likely a consequence of factors not considered by the underlying microstructural models (such as intercomponent and intracompartmental kurtosis). Conclusion: Powder-averaged SMT and (2-component) SM are unable to accurately report μFA and other microstructural parameters in ex vivo tissues. Improper model assumptions and constraints can significantly compromise parameter specificity. Further developments and validations are required prior to implementation of these models in clinical or preclinical research.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…