Cyclically monotone non-optimal N-marginal transport plans and Smirnov-type decompositions for N-flows

Abstract

In the setting of optimal transport with N 2 marginals, a necessary condition for transport plans to be optimal is that they are c-cyclically monotone. For N=2 there exist several proofs that in very general settings c-cyclical monotoncity is also sufficient for optimality, while for N 3 this is only known under strong conditions on c. Here we give a counterexample which shows that c-cylclical monotonicity is in general not sufficient for optimality if N 3. Comparison with the N=2 case shows how the main proof strategies valid for the case N=2 might fail for N 3. We leave open the question of what is the optimal condition on c under which c-cyclical monotonicity is sufficient for optimality. The new concept of an N-flow seems to be helpful for understanding the counterexample: our construction is based on the absence of finite-support N-cycles in the set where our counterexample cost c is finite. To follow this idea we formulate a Smirnov-type decomposition for N-flows.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…