Concordances to prime hyperbolic virtual knots

Abstract

Let 0,1 be closed oriented surfaces. Two oriented knots K0 ⊂ 0 × [0,1] and K1 ⊂ 1 × [0,1] are said to be (virtually) concordant if there is a compact oriented 3-manifold W and a smoothly and properly embedded annulus A in W × [0,1] such that ∂ W=1 -0 and ∂ A=K1 -K0. This notion of concordance, due to Turaev, is equivalent to concordance of virtual knots, due to Kauffman. A prime virtual knot, in the sense of Matveev, is one for which no thickened surface representative K ⊂ × [0,1] admits a nontrivial decomposition along a separating vertical annulus that intersects K in two points. Here we prove that every knot K ⊂ × [0,1] is concordant to a prime satellite knot and a prime hyperbolic knot. For homologically trivial knots in × [0,1], we prove this can be done so that the Alexander polynomial is preserved. This generalizes the corresponding results for classical knot concordance, due to Bleiler, Kirby-Lickorish, Livingston, Myers, Nakanishi, and Soma. The new challenge for virtual knots lies in proving primeness. Contrary to the classical case, not every hyperbolic knot in × [0,1] is prime and not every composite knot is a satellite. Our results are obtained using a generalization of tangles in 3-balls we call complementary tangles. Properties of complementary tangles are studied in detail.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…