P-Optimal Proof Systems for Each NP-Complete Set but no Complete Disjoint NP-Pairs Relative to an Oracle

Abstract

Pudl\'ak [Pud17] lists several major conjectures from the field of proof complexity and asks for oracles that separate corresponding relativized conjectures. Among these conjectures are: - DisjNP: The class of all disjoint NP-pairs does not have many-one complete elements. - SAT: NP does not contain many-one complete sets that have P-optimal proof systems. - UP: UP does not have many-one complete problems. - NPcoNP: NP does not have many-one complete problems. As one answer to this question, we construct an oracle relative to which DisjNP, SAT, UP, and NPcoNP hold, i.e., there is no relativizable proof for the implication DisjNP UP NPcoNP⇒SAT. In particular, regarding the conjectures by Pudl\'ak this extends a result by Khaniki [Kha19].

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…