Breaking of 1RSB in random MAX-NAE-SAT

Abstract

For several models of random constraint satisfaction problems, it was conjectured by physicists and later proved that a sharp satisfiability transition occurs. For random k-SAT and related models it happens at clause density α around 2k. Just below the threshold, further results suggest that the solution space has a "1RSB" structure of a large bounded number of near-orthogonal clusters inside the space of variable assignments \0,1\N. In the unsatisfiable regime, it is natural to consider max-satisfiability: violating the least number of constraints. For a simplified variant, the strong refutation problem, there is strong evidence that an algorithmic transition occurs around α = Nk/2-1. For α bounded in N, a very precise estimate of the max-sat value was obtained by Achlioptas, Naor, and Peres (2007), but it is not sharp enough to indicate the nature of the energy landscape. Later work (Sen, 2016; Panchenko, 2016) shows that for α very large (roughly, above 64k) the max-sat value approaches the mean-field (complete graph) limit: this is conjectured to have an "FRSB" structure where near-optimal configurations form clusters within clusters, in an ultrametric hierarchy of infinite depth inside \0,1\N. A stronger form of FRSB was shown in several recent works to have algorithmic implications (again, in complete graphs). Consequently we find it of interest to understand how the model transitions from 1RSB near the satisfiability threshold, to (conjecturally) FRSB for large α. In this paper we show that in the random regular k-NAE-SAT model, the 1RSB description breaks down already above α 4k/k3. This is proved by an explicit perturbation in the 2RSB parameter space, inspired by the "bug proliferation" mechanism proposed by physicists (Montanari and Ricci-Tersenghi, 2003; Krzakala, Pagnani, and Weigt, 2004).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…