On the counting problem in inverse Littlewood--Offord theory
Abstract
Let ε1, …c, εn be i.i.d. Rademacher random variables taking values 1 with probability 1/2 each. Given an integer vector a = (a1, …c, an), its concentration probability is the quantity (a):=x∈ Z(ε1 a1+…+εn an = x). The Littlewood-Offord problem asks for bounds on (a) under various hypotheses on a, whereas the inverse Littlewood-Offord problem, posed by Tao and Vu, asks for a characterization of all vectors a for which (a) is large. In this paper, we study the associated counting problem: How many integer vectors a belonging to a specified set have large (a)? The motivation for our study is that in typical applications, the inverse Littlewood-Offord theorems are only used to obtain such counting estimates. Using a more direct approach, we obtain significantly better bounds for this problem than those obtained using the inverse Littlewood--Offord theorems of Tao and Vu and of Nguyen and Vu. Moreover, we develop a framework for deriving upper bounds on the probability of singularity of random discrete matrices that utilizes our counting result. To illustrate the methods, we present the first `exponential-type' (i.e., (-nc) for some positive constant c) upper bounds on the singularity probability for the following two models: (i) adjacency matrices of dense signed random regular digraphs, for which the previous best known bound is O(n-1/4) due to Cook; and (ii) dense row-regular \0,1\-matrices, for which the previous best known bound is OC(n-C) for any constant C>0 due to Nguyen.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.