Some Problems in Logic: Applications of Kripke's Notion of Fulfilment

Abstract

This is a study of S. Kripke's notion of fulfilment. Motivated by Paris-Harrington statement, Kripke was looking for a proof of G\"odel's Incompleteness Theorem which was model-theoretic, natural (without self-reference), and easy. Fulfilment gives a versatile tool for both Proof and Model Theory. We begin with short proofs to a number of classical results. With two new results: there is an easily definable subring R of the primitive recursive functions such that for any non-principal ultrafilter D on ω, R/D is a recursively saturated model of Peano arithmetic; and for any r.e. theory T and for any given r.e. set, we can feasibly find a 10 formula which semi-represents it in T. We then give a version of Herbrand's Theorem, and of the Hilbert-Ackermann method of proving consistency, answering a problem of D. Guaspari:\[\φ∈0k:φ is 0k-conservative over PA\\]is a complete 02 set. We extend H. Friedman's method for results of such as 12-AC is 13-conservative over (11-CA)<0, along with uniform versions\[∀α<0\;(11-CA)α\,RFN13(12-AC)\] Then there are some model-theoretic applications, starting with non-ω-models. We extend the theorem of D. Scott involving Weak K\"onig's Lemma, and describe the order types of elementary initial segments of recursively saturated models. For ω-models, we extend Friedman's theorem on minimal models of analysis, and develop indicators for countable fragments of L∞ω, with some representability results in ω-logic. We close with an exposition of the Paris-Harrington statement.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…