Jagged Islands of Bound Entanglement and Witness-Parameterized Probabilities

Abstract

We report several witness-parameterized families of bound-entangled probabilities. Two pertain to the d=3 (two-qutrit) and a third to the d=4 (two-ququart) subsets analyzed by Hiesmayr and L\"offler of "magic" simplices of Bell states. The Hilbert-Schmidt probabilities of positive-partial-transpose (PPT) states--within which we search for bound-entangled states--are 8 π 27 3 ≈ 0.537422 (d=3) and 12+ (2-3)8 3 ≈ 0.404957 (d=4). We obtain bound-entangled probabilities of -49+4 π 27 3+ (3)6 ≈ 0.00736862 and -204+7 (7)+168 3 -1(1114)1134 ≈ 0.00325613 (d=3) and 8 (2)27-59288 ≈ 0.00051583 and 24 csch-1(817)17 17-91544 ≈ 0.00218722 (d=4). Thus, the total entanglement probability appears to equal (1-8 π 27 3)+281 (4 3 π -21) = 1327 ≈ 0.481481.) The families, encompassing these results, are parameterized using generalized Choi and Jafarizadeh-Behzadi-Akbari witnesses. The same bound-entangled probability was achieved with both--the sets ("jagged islands") detected having void intersection. The entanglement (bound and "non-bound"/"free") probability for both was 16 ≈ 0.16667, while their union and intersection gave 29 ≈ 0.22222 and 19 ≈ 0.11111. Further, we examine generalized Horodecki states, as well as estimating PPT-probabilities of approximately 0.39339 (very well-fitted by 7 π25 5 ≈ 0.39338962) and 0.115732 ( for the original (8- [two-qutrit] and 15 [two-ququart]-dimensional) magic simplices themselves.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…