Dependent products and 1-inaccessible universes
Abstract
The purpose of this writing is to show that, if we use the definition of elementary ∞-topos that has been proposed by Mike Shulman, then the fact that every geometric ∞-topos satisfies the required axioms, more specifically the last one of them, is actually something close to a large cardinal assumption. Putting it precisely, we will show that, once a Grothendieck universe has been chosen, the fact that every geometric ∞-topos satisfies Shulman's axioms is equivalent to saying that the Grothendieck universe was 1-inaccessible to start with, a condition which is strictly stronger than just being inaccessible. Moreover, a perfectly analogous result can be shown if instead of geometric ∞-toposes our analysis relies on ordinary sheaf toposes. In conclusion, it will be shown that, under stronger assumptions positing the existence of 1-inaccessible cardinals inside the Grothendieck universe, examples of Shulman ∞-toposes which are not geometric can be found.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.