Anticoncentration for subgraph counts in random graphs

Abstract

Fix a graph H and some p∈ (0,1), and let XH be the number of copies of H in a random graph G(n,p). Random variables of this form have been intensively studied since the foundational work of Erdos and R\'enyi. There has been a great deal of progress over the years on the large-scale behaviour of XH, but the more challenging problem of understanding the small-ball probabilities has remained poorly understood until now. More precisely, how likely can it be that XH falls in some small interval or is equal to some particular value? In this paper we prove the almost-optimal result that if H is connected then for any x∈ N we have (XH=x) n1-v(H)+o(1). Our proof proceeds by iteratively breaking XH into different components which fluctuate at "different scales", and relies on a new anticoncentration inequality for random vectors that behave "almost linearly".

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…