New solution of a problem of Kolmogorov on width asymptotics in holomorphic function spaces

Abstract

Given a domain D in Cn and K a compact subset of D, the set AKD of all restrictions of functions holomorphic on D the modulus of which is bounded by 1 is a compact subset of the Banach space C(K) of continuous functions on K. The sequence (dm(AKD))m∈ N of Kolmogorov m-widths of AKD provides a measure of the degree of compactness of the set AKD in C(K) and the study of its asymptotics has a long history, essentially going back to Kolmogorov's work on ε-entropy of compact sets in the 1950s. In the 1980s Zakharyuta showed that for suitable D and K the asymptotics equation* m ∞- dm(AKD)m1/n = 2π ( n!C(K,D) ) 1/n\,, equation* where C(K,D) is the Bedford-Taylor relative capacity of K in D is implied by a conjecture, now known as Zakharyuta's Conjecture, concerning the approximability of the regularised relative extremal function of K and D by certain pluricomplex Green functions. Zakharyuta's Conjecture was proved by Nivoche in 2004 thus settling the asymptotics above at the same time. We shall give a new proof of the asymptotics above for D strictly hyperconvex and K non-pluripolar which does not rely on Zakharyuta's Conjecture. Instead we proceed more directly by a two-pronged approach establishing sharp upper and lower bounds for the Kolmogorov widths. The lower bounds follow from concentration results of independent interest for the eigenvalues of a certain family of Toeplitz operators, while the upper bounds follow from an application of the Bergman-Weil formula together with an exhaustion procedure by special holomorphic polyhedra.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…