"Splitting" magnetic catalysis effect prevents vacuum superconductivity in strong magnetic fields

Abstract

By comparing the two- and three-flavor Nambu--Jona-Lasinio (NJL) models, we demonstrate that the naively expected vacuum superconductivity (VSC) in constant magnetic field B=B z is disfavored due to the splitting magnetic catalysis effect (MCE) to chiral condensates with different quark flavors. Based on the simple two-flavor NJL model, we illuminate, in the lowest Landau level approximation, the similar origins of π0 and +1 (+ meson with spin Sz=1) mass reductions with smaller B and their different features at larger B. With the full Landau levels, the two-flavor NJL model is found to be invalid to study the magnetic field effect to +1 meson with physical vacuum mass 775~ MeV. Then, restricted to meson mass below two-quark threshold in vacuum, that is mv<2mqv, it is found that π0 mass decreases and then increases with B slowly, and +1 mass vanishing point is delayed to larger B compared to the point particle result. In the more realistic three-flavor NJL model, all the quark masses split in strong magnetic field as a combinatorial result of their different current masses and electric charges. By choosing a vacuum mass closer to the physical one, +1 meson mass is found to be consistent with the LQCD results semi-quantitatively in smaller B region but increase in larger B region. These features are mainly outcomes of the interplay between the Sz-B coupling effect and splitting MCE to the composite u and d quarks, which definitely disfavors VSC when the latter dominates. Furthermore, mesonic flavor mixing is modified by B among the neutral pseudoscalars: π0,η0 and η8, which is very important to suppress the mass enhancement of the effective mass eigenstates at large B.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…