Every Graph Is Local Antimagic Total And Its Applications To Local Antimagic (Total) Chromatic Numbers
Abstract
A graph G = (V, E) of order p and size q is said to be local antimagic if there exists a bijection g:E(G) \1,2,…,q\ such that for any pair of adjacent vertices u and v, g+(u) g+(v), where g+(u)=Σuv∈ E(G) g(uv) is the induced vertex color of u under g. We also say G is local antimagic total if there exists a bijection f: V E \1,2,… ,p+q\ such that for any pair of adjacent vertices u and v, w(u)= w(v), where w(u)= f(u) +Σuv∈ E(G) f(uv) is the induced vertex weight of u under f. The local antimagic (and local antimagic total) chromatic number of G, denoted la(G) (and lat(G)), is the minimum number of distinct induced vertex colors (and weights) over all local antimagic (and local antimagic total) labelings of G. We also say a local antimagic total labeling is local super antimagic total if f(v)∈\1,2,…,p\ for each v∈ V(G). In [Proof of a local antimagic conjecture, Discrete Math. Theor. Comp. Sc., 20(1) (2018), \#18], the author proved that every connected graph of order at least 3 is local antimagic. Using this result, we provide a very short proof that every graph is local antimagic total. We showed that there exists close relationship between la(G K1) and lat(G). A sufficient condition is also given for the corresponding local super antimagic total labeling. Sharp bounds of lat(G) and close relationships between lat(G) and la(G K1) are found. Bounds of lat(G-e) in terms of lat(G) for a graph G with an edge e deleted are also obtained. These relationships are used to determine the exact values of lat for many graphs G. We also conjecture that each graph G of order at least 3 has lat(G) la(G).
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.