Heat transfer in rough-wall turbulent thermal convection in the ultimate regime

Abstract

Heat and momentum transfer in wall-bounded turbulent flow, coupled with the effects of wall-roughness, is one of the outstanding questions in turbulence research. In the standard Rayleigh-B\'enard problem for natural thermal convection, it is notoriously difficult to reach the so-called ultimate regime in which the near-wall boundary layers are turbulent. Following the analyses proposed by Kraichnan [Phys. Fluids vol 5., pp. 1374-1389 (1962)] and Grossmann & Lohse [Phys. Fluids vol. 23, pp. 045108 (2011)], we instead utilize recent direct numerical simulations of forced convection over a rough wall in a minimal channel [MacDonald, Hutchins & Chung, J. Fluid Mech. vol. 861, pp. 138--162 (2019)] to directly study these turbulent boundary layers. We focus on the heat transport (in dimensionless form, the Nusselt number Nu) or equivalently the heat transfer coefficient (the Stanton number Ch). Extending the analyses of Kraichnan and Grossmann & Lohse, we assume logarithmic temperature profiles with a roughness-induced shift to predict an effective scaling of Nu Ra0.42, where Ra is the dimensionless temperature difference, corresponding to Ch Re-0.16, where Re is the centerline Reynolds number. This is pronouncedly different from the skin-friction coefficient Cf, which in the fully rough turbulent regime is independent of Re, due to the dominant pressure drag. In rough-wall turbulence the absence of the analog to pressure drag in the temperature advection equation is the origin for the very different scaling properties of the heat transfer as compared to the momentum transfer. This analysis suggests that, unlike momentum transfer, the asymptotic ultimate regime, where Nu Ra1/2, will never be reached for heat transfer at finite Ra.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…