Novel chiral Hamiltonian and observables in light and medium-mass nuclei

Abstract

A novel parameterisation of a Hamiltonian based on chiral effective field theory is introduced. Specifically, three-nucleon operators at next-to-next-to-leading order are combined with an existing (and successful) two-body interaction containing terms up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order. The resulting potential is labelled N\!N\!+3N(lnl). The objective of the present work is to investigate the performance of this new Hamiltonian across light and medium-mass nuclei. Binding energies, nuclear radii and excitation spectra are computed using no-core shell model and self-consistent Green's function approaches. Calculations with N\!N\!+3N(lnl) are compared to two other representative Hamiltonians currently in use, namely NNLOsat and the older N\!N\!+3N(400). Overall, the performance of the novel interaction is very encouraging. In light nuclei, total energies are generally in good agreement with experimental data. Known spectra are also well reproduced with a few notable exceptions. The good description of ground-state energies carries on to heavier nuclei, all the way from oxygen to nickel isotopes. Except for those involving excitation processes across the N=20 gap, which is overestimated by the new interaction, spectra are of very good quality, in general superior to those obtained with NNLOsat. Although largely improving on N\!N\!+3N(400) results, charge radii calculated with N\!N\!+3N(lnl) still underestimate experimental values, as opposed to the ones computed with NNLOsat that successfully reproduce available data on nickel. On the whole, the new two- plus three-nucleon Hamiltonian introduced in the present work represents a promising alternative to existing nuclear interactions.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…