Sets without k-term progressions can have many shorter progressions

Abstract

Let fs,k(n) be the maximum possible number of s-term arithmetic progressions in a sequence a1<a2<…<an of n integers which contains no k-term arithmetic progression. For all integers k > s ≥ 3, we prove that n ∞ fs,k(n) n = 2, which answers an old question of Erdos. In fact, we prove upper and lower bounds for fs,k(n) which show that its growth is closely related to the bounds in Szemer\'edi's theorem.

0

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…