Canonical Deformation of N=2 AdS4 SUGRA

Abstract

It is known that one can define a consistent theory of extended, N=2 anti-de Sitter (AdS) Supergravity (SUGRA) in D=4. Besides the standard gravitational part, this theory involves a single U(1) gauge field and a pair of Majorana vector-spinors that can be mixed into a pair of charged spin-3/2 gravitini. The action for N=2 AdS4 SUGRA is invariant under SO(1,3)× U(1) gauge transformations, and under local SUSY. We present a geometric action that involves two "inhomogeneous" parts: an orthosymplectic OSp(4 2) gauge-invariant action of the Yang-Mills type, and a supplementary action invariant under purely bosonic SO(2,3)× U(1) Sp(4)× SO(2) sector of OSp(4 2), that needs to be added for consistency. This action reduces to N=2 AdS4 SUGRA after gauge fixing, for which we use a constrained auxiliary field in the manner of Stelle and West. Canonical deformation is performed by using the Seiberg-Witten approach to noncommutative (NC) gauge field theory with the Moyal product. The NC-deformed action is expanded in powers of the deformation parameter θμ up to the first order. We show that N=2 AdS4 SUGRA has non-vanishing linear NC correction in the physical gauge, originating from the additional, purely bosonic action. For comparison, simple N=1 Poinacar\'e SUGRA can be obtained in the same manner, directly from an OSp(4 1) gauge-invariant action. The first non-vanishing NC correction is quadratic in θμ and therefore exceedingly difficult to calculate. Under Wigner-In\"on\"u (WI) contraction, N=2 AdS superalgebra reduces to N=2 Poincar\'e superalgebra, and it is not clear whether this relation holds after canonical deformation. We present the linear NC correction to N=2 AdS4 SUGRA explicitly, discuss its low-energy limit, and what remains of it after WI contraction.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…