Generalization of Abhyankar's Lemma to henselian valued fields

Abstract

Abhyankar showed that for a finite tame extension L1/K and a finite extension L2/K of P-adic fields, the condition [ L1 : K] divides [ L2 : K] is sufficient to eliminate ramification, that is, L1 · L2 / L2 is unramified. In this paper, we show that the above condition is not sufficient in the case of an arbitrary henselian valued field. We construct a counterexample illustrating that fact. We also give a necessary and sufficient condition for the elimination of tame ramification of a henselian field after a finite extension of the base field.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…