Distinction for unipotent p-adic groups
Abstract
Let F be a p-adic field and U be a unipotent group defined over F, and set U=U(F). Let σ be an involution of U defined over F. Adapting the arguments of Yves Benoist in the real case, we prove the following result: an irreducible representation π of U is Uσ-distinguished if and only if it is σ-self-dual and in this case HomUσ(π,C) has dimension one. When σ is a Galois involution these results imply a bijective correspondence between the set Irr(Uσ) of isomorphism classes of irreducible representations of Uσ and the set IrrUσ-dist(U) of isomorphism classes of distinguished irreducible representations of U.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.