An inversion formula with hypergeometric polynomials and application to singular integral operators
Abstract
Given parameters x R- \1\ and , Re() < 0, and the space H0 of entire functions in C vanishing at 0, we consider the family of operators L = c0 · δ M with constant c0 = (1-)x/(1-x), δ = z \, d/dz and integral operator M defined by Mf(z) = ∫01 e- zxt-(1-(1-x)t) \, f ( zx \, t-(1-t) ) \, dtt, z ∈ C, for all f ∈ H0. Inverting L or M proves equivalent to solve a singular Volterra equation of the first kind. The inversion of operator L on H0 leads us to derive a new class of linear inversion formulas T = A(x,) · S S = B(x,) · T between sequences S = (Sn)n ∈ N* and T = (Tn)n ∈ N*, where the infinite lower-triangular matrix A(x,) and its inverse B(x,) involve Hypergeometric polynomials F(·), namely \ arrayll An,k(x,) = (-1)knkF(k-n,-n;-n;x), Bn,k(x,) = (-1)knkF(k-n,k;k;x) array . for 1 ≤slant k ≤slant n. Functional relations between the ordinary (resp. exponential) generating functions of the related sequences S and T are also given. These relations finally enable us to derive the integral representation L-1f(z) = 1-x2iπ x \, ez ∫(0+)1 e-xtzt(1-t) \, f ( xz \, (-t)(1-t)1- ) \, dt, z ∈ C, for the inverse L-1 of operator L on H0, where the integration contour encircles the point 0.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.