Total Least Squares Regression in Input Sparsity Time

Abstract

In the total least squares problem, one is given an m × n matrix A, and an m × d matrix B, and one seeks to "correct" both A and B, obtaining matrices A and B, so that there exists an X satisfying the equation AX = B. Typically the problem is overconstrained, meaning that m (n,d). The cost of the solution A, B is given by \|A-A\|F2 + \|B - B\|F2. We give an algorithm for finding a solution X to the linear system AX=B for which the cost \|A-A\|F2 + \|B-B\|F2 is at most a multiplicative (1+ε) factor times the optimal cost, up to an additive error η that may be an arbitrarily small function of n. Importantly, our running time is O( nnz(A) + nnz(B) ) + poly(n/ε) · d, where for a matrix C, nnz(C) denotes its number of non-zero entries. Importantly, our running time does not directly depend on the large parameter m. As total least squares regression is known to be solvable via low rank approximation, a natural approach is to invoke fast algorithms for approximate low rank approximation, obtaining matrices A and B from this low rank approximation, and then solving for X so that AX = B. However, existing algorithms do not apply since in total least squares the rank of the low rank approximation needs to be n, and so the running time of known methods would be at least mn2. In contrast, we are able to achieve a much faster running time for finding X by never explicitly forming the equation A X = B, but instead solving for an X which is a solution to an implicit such equation. Finally, we generalize our algorithm to the total least squares problem with regularization.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…