Variations on 11 Determinacy and ω1
Abstract
We consider a seemingly weaker form of 11 Turing determinacy. Let 2 ≤ < ω1CK, Weak-Turing-Det (11) is the statement: Every 11 set of reals cofinal in the Turing degrees contains two Turing distinct, 0-equivalent reals. We show in ZF-: Weak-Turing-Det (11) implies: for every < ω1CK there is a transitive model: M ZF- + exists. As a corollary: If every cofinal 11 set of Turing degrees contains both a degree and its jump, then for every < ω1CK, there is a transitive model: M ZF- + exists. -- With a simple proof, this improves upon a well-known result of Harvey Friedman on the strength of Borel determinacy (though not assessed level-by-level). -- Invoking Tony Martin's proof of Borel determinacy, Weak-Turing-Det (11) implies 11 determinacy. We show further that 11 determinacy imparts weak determinacy properties to the class 11.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.