The Stellar Population of Metal-Poor Galaxies at z ≈ 0.8 and the Evolution of the Mass-Metallicity Relation

Abstract

We present results from deep Spitzer/Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) observations of 28 metal-poor, strongly star-forming galaxies selected from the DEEP2 Galaxy Survey. By modelling infrared and optical photometry, we derive stellar masses and other stellar properties. We determine that these metal-poor galaxies have low stellar masses, M ≈108.1-109.5 M. Combined with the Balmer-derived star formation rates (SFRs), these galaxies have average inverse SFR/M of ≈100 Myr. The evolution of stellar mass-gas metallicity relation to z≈0.8 is measured by combining the modelled masses with previously obtained spectroscopic measurements of metallicity from [O III] λ4363 detections. Here, we include measurements for 79 galaxies from the Metal Abundances across Cosmic Time Survey. Our mass-metallicity relation is lower at a given stellar mass than at z=0.1 by 0.27 dex. This demonstrates a strong evolution in the mass-metallicity relation, (1+z)-1.45+0.61-0.76. We find that the shape of the z≈0.8 mass-metallicity relation, a steep rise in metallicity at low stellar masses, transitioning to a plateau at higher masses, is consistent with z0.1 studies. We also compare the evolution in metallicity between z≈0.8 and z0.1 against recent strong-line diagnostic studies at intermediate redshifts and find good agreement. Specifically, we find that lower mass galaxies (4×108 M) built up their metal content 1.6 times more rapidly than higher mass galaxies (1010 M). Finally, we examine whether the mass-metallicity relation has a secondary dependence on SFR, and statistically concluded that there is no strong secondary dependence for z≈0.8 low-mass galaxies.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…