AND Testing and Robust Judgement Aggregation

Abstract

A function f\0,1\n \0,1\ is called an approximate AND-homomorphism if choosing x, y∈\0,1\n randomly, we have that f( x y) = f( x) f( y) with probability at least 1-ε, where x y = (x1 y1,…,xn yn). We prove that if f \0,1\n \0,1\ is an approximate AND-homomorphism, then f is δ-close to either a constant function or an AND function, where δ(ε) 0 as ε0. This improves on a result of Nehama, who proved a similar statement in which δ depends on n. Our theorem implies a strong result on judgement aggregation in computational social choice. In the language of social choice, our result shows that if f is ε-close to satisfying judgement aggregation, then it is δ(ε)-close to an oligarchy (the name for the AND function in social choice theory). This improves on Nehama's result, in which δ decays polynomially with n. Our result follows from a more general one, in which we characterize approximate solutions to the eigenvalue equation T f = λ g, where T is the downwards noise operator T f(x) = E y[f(x y)], f is [0,1]-valued, and g is \0,1\-valued. We identify all exact solutions to this equation, and show that any approximate solution in which T f and λ g are close is close to an exact solution.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…