Absorbing Boundary Condition as Limiting Case of Imaginary Potentials

Abstract

Imaginary potentials such as V(x)=-iv 1(x) (with v>0 a constant, a subset of 3-space, and 1 its characteristic function) have been used in quantum mechanics as models of a detector. They represent the effect of a "soft" detector that takes a while to notice a particle in the detector volume . In order to model a "hard" detector (i.e., one that registers a particle as soon as it enters ), one may think of taking the limit v∞ of increasing detector strength v. However, as pointed out by Allcock, in this limit the particle never enters ; its wave function gets reflected at the boundary ∂ of in the same way as by a Dirichlet boundary condition on ∂ . This phenomenon, a cousin of the "quantum Zeno effect," might suggest that a hard detector is mathematically impossible. Nevertheless, a mathematical description of a hard detector has recently been put forward in the form of the "absorbing boundary rule" involving an absorbing boundary condition on the detecting surface ∂ . We show here that in a suitable (non-obvious) limit, the imaginary potential V yields a non-trivial distribution of detection time and place in agreement with the absorbing boundary rule. That is, a hard detector can be obtained as a limit, but it is a different limit than Allcock considered.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…