Tight Bounds for Planar Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph with Fixed Number of Terminals (and Extensions)
Abstract
(see paper for full abstract) Given a vertex-weighted directed graph G=(V,E) and a set T=\t1, t2, … tk\ of k terminals, the objective of the SCSS problem is to find a vertex set H⊂eq V of minimum weight such that G[H] contains a ti→ tj path for each i≠ j. The problem is NP-hard, but Feldman and Ruhl [FOCS '99; SICOMP '06] gave a novel nO(k) algorithm for the SCSS problem, where n is the number of vertices in the graph and k is the number of terminals. We explore how much easier the problem becomes on planar directed graphs: - Our main algorithmic result is a 2O(k)· nO(k) algorithm for planar SCSS, which is an improvement of a factor of O(k) in the exponent over the algorithm of Feldman and Ruhl. - Our main hardness result is a matching lower bound for our algorithm: we show that planar SCSS does not have an f(k)· no(k) algorithm for any computable function f, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. The following additional results put our upper and lower bounds in context: - In general graphs, we cannot hope for such a dramatic improvement over the nO(k) algorithm of Feldman and Ruhl: assuming ETH, SCSS in general graphs does not have an f(k)· no(k/ k) algorithm for any computable function f. - Feldman and Ruhl generalized their nO(k) algorithm to the more general Directed Steiner Network (DSN) problem; here the task is to find a subgraph of minimum weight such that for every source si there is a path to the corresponding terminal ti. We show that, assuming ETH, there is no f(k)· no(k) time algorithm for DSN on acyclic planar graphs.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.