On Bipartite Distinct Distances in the Plane

Abstract

Given sets P, Q ⊂eq R2 of sizes m and n respectively, we are interested in the number of distinct distances spanned by P × Q. Let D(m, n) denote the minimum number of distances determined by sets in R2 of sizes m and n respectively, where m ≤ n. Elekes CircleGrids showed that D(m, n) = O(mn) when m ≤ n1/3. For m ≥ n1/3, we have the upper bound D(m, n) = O(n/ n) as in the classical distinct distances problem. In this work, we show that Elekes' construction is tight by deriving the lower bound of D(m, n) = (mn) when m ≤ n1/3. This is done by adapting Sz\'ekely's crossing number argument. We also extend the Guth and Katz analysis for the classical distinct distances problem to show a lower bound of D(m, n) = (mn/ n) when m ≥ n1/3.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…