Systematic study of the peak energy of the broad-band Gamma-Ray Burst
Abstract
We have performed a systematic study of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), which have various values in the peak energy of the F spectrum of the prompt emission, E peak, observed by Swift/BAT and Fermi/GBM, investigating their prompt and X-ray afterglow emissions. We cataloged the long-lasting GRBs observed by the Swift between 2004 December and 2014 February in 3 categories according to the classification by 2008ApJ...679..570S: X-Ray Flashes (XRFs), X-Ray Rich GRBs (XRRs), and Classical GRBs (C-GRBs). We then derived E obs peak, as well as E src peak if viable, of the Swift spectra of their prompt emission. We also analyzed their X-Ray afterglows and found the trend that the GRB events with a lower E peak src, i.e. softer GRBs, are fainter in the 0.3--10 keV X-ray luminosity and decay more slowly than harder GRBs. The intrinsic event rates of the XRFs, XRRs, and C-GRBs were calculated, using the Swift/BAT trigger algorithm. That of either of the XRRs and XRFs is larger than that of the C-GRBs. If we assume that the observational diversity of E peak is explained with the off-axis model 2002ApJ...571L..31Y,2004ApJ...607L..103Y, these results yield the jet half-opening angle of θ 0.3, and the variance of the observing angles θ obs 0.6. This implies that the tiny variance of the observing angles of 0.6 would be responsible for the E peak diversity observed by Swift/BAT, which is unrealistic. Therefore, we conclude that the E peak diversity is not explained with the off-axis model, but is likely to originate from some intrinsic properties of the jets.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.