A systematic study of the advection-dominated accretion flow for the origin of the X-ray emission in weakly magnetized low-level accreting neutron star

Abstract

Observationally, the X-ray spectrum (0.5-10 keV) of low-level accreting neutron stars (NSs) can generally be well fitted by the model with two components, i.e, a thermal soft X-ray component plus a power-law component. Meanwhile, the fractional contribution of the power-law luminosity η (η L power\ law 0.5-10 keV/L 0.5-10 keV) varies with the X-ray luminosity L 0.5-10 keV. In this paper, we systematically investigate the origin of such X-ray emission within the framework of the advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF) around a weakly magnetized NS, in which the thermal soft X-ray component arises from the surface of the NS and the power-law component arises from the ADAF itself. We test the effects of the viscosity parameter α in the ADAF and thermalized parameter f th (describing the fraction of the ADAF energy released at the surface of the NS as thermal emission) on the relation of η versus L 0.5-10 keV. It is found that η is nearly a constant ( zero) with L 0.5-10 keV for different α with f th=1, which is inconsistent with observations. Meanwhile, it is found that a change of f th can significantly change the relation of η versus L 0.5-10 keV. By comparing with a sample of non-pulsating NS-LMXBs probably dominated by low-level accretion onto NSs, it is found that a small value of f th 0.1 is needed to match the observed range of η 10\% in the diagram of η versus L 0.5-10 keV. Finally, we argue that the small value of f th 0.1 implies that the radiative efficiency of NSs with an ADAF accretion may not be as high as the predicted result previously of ε M GM R*/ M c2 0.2 despite the existence of the hard surface.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…