Primordial non-Gaussianity without tails -- how to measure fNL with the bulk of the density PDF

Abstract

We investigate the possibility to detect primordial non-Gaussianity by analysing the bulk of the probability distribution function (PDF) of late-time cosmic density fluctuations. For this purpose we devise a new method to predict the impact of general non-Gaussian initial conditions on the late-time density PDF. At redshift z=1 and for a smoothing scale of 30Mpc/h our predictions agree with the high-resolution Quijote N-body simulations to 0.2\% precision. This is within cosmic variance of a 100(Gpc/h)3 survey volume. When restricting to this 30Mpc/h smoothing scale and to mildly non-linear densities (δ[30Mpc/h] ∈ [-0.3, 0.4]) and also marginalizing over potential ignorance of the amplitude of the non-linear power spectrum an analysis of the PDF for such a survey volume can still measure the amplitude of different primordial bispectrum shapes to an accuracy of fNLloc= 7.4\ ,\ fNLequi= 22.0\ ,\ fNLortho= 46.0 . When pushing to smaller scales and assuming a joint analysis of the PDF with smoothing radii of 30Mpc/h and 15Mpc/h (δ[15Mpc/h] ∈ [-0.4, 0.5]) this improves to fNLloc= 3.3\ ,\ fNLequi= 11.0\ ,\ fNLortho= 17.0\ - even when marginalizing over the non-linear variances at both scales as two free parameters. Especially, such an analysis could simultaneously measure fNL and the amplitude and slope of the non-linear power spectrum. However, at 15Mpc/h our predictions are only accurate to 0.8\% for the considered density range. We discuss how this has to be improved in order to push to these small scales and make full use of upcoming surveys with a PDF-based analysis.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…