Solving Xq+1+X+a=0 over Finite Fields

Abstract

Solving the equation Pa(X):=Xq+1+X+a=0 over finite field Q, where Q=pn, q=pk and p is a prime, arises in many different contexts including finite geometry, the inverse Galois problem ACZ2000, the construction of difference sets with Singer parameters DD2004, determining cross-correlation between m-sequences DOBBERTIN2006,HELLESETH2008 and to construct error-correcting codes Bracken2009, as well as to speed up the index calculus method for computing discrete logarithms on finite fields GGGZ2013,GGGZ2013+ and on algebraic curves M2014. Subsequently, in Bluher2004,HK2008,HK2010,BTT2014,Bluher2016,KM2019,CMPZ2019,MS2019, the Q-zeros of Pa(X) have been studied: in Bluher2004 it was shown that the possible values of the number of the zeros that Pa(X) has in Q is 0, 1, 2 or p(n, k)+1. Some criteria for the number of the Q-zeros of Pa(x) were found in HK2008,HK2010,BTT2014,KM2019,MS2019. However, while the ultimate goal is to identify all the Q-zeros, even in the case p=2, it was solved only under the condition (n, k)=1 KM2019. We discuss this equation without any restriction on p and (n,k). New criteria for the number of the Q-zeros of Pa(x) are proved. For the cases of one or two Q-zeros, we provide explicit expressions for these rational zeros in terms of a. For the case of p(n, k)+1 rational zeros, we provide a parametrization of such a's and express the p(n, k)+1 rational zeros by using that parametrization.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…